Journal Browser

Publication Policy

- update at: 19 Sep 2024

1. Peer Review Policy
 
Net Zero operate a single anonymized peer review whereby the names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. All research articles, reviews, and most other article types, published in Net Zero journal undergo peer review. This usually involves review by at least two independent, expert peer reviewers. All manuscripts will be checked for plagiarism using the iThenticate software to detect instances of overlapping and similar text by the in-house editor.
 
All submissions to Net Zero are first reviewed for completeness and only then sent to be assessed by an Editor who will decide whether they are suitable for peer review. Where an Editor is on the author list or has any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee peer review. Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports when making a decision, but are not bound by the opinions or recommendations therein. A concern raised by a single peer reviewer or the Editor themself may result in the manuscript being rejected. Authors receive peer review reports with the editorial decision on their manuscript.
 
Peer reviewer selection is critical to the publication process. It is based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, conflict of interest and previous performance. Speed, thoroughness, sound reasoning and collegiality are highly desirable.
 
  • Editor(s) are expected to obtain a minimum of two peer reviewers for manuscripts reporting primary research or secondary analysis of primary research.
  • Editors are strongly encouraged to consider geographical regions, gender identities, racial/ethnic groups, and other groups when inviting peer reviewers.
  • When submitting the manuscript, the author(s) may be asked to suggest 2-3 potential peer reviewers. The editors will not necessarily invite the suggested reviewers but these suggestions can help speed up the peer review process.
  • Peer review reports should be in English and provide constructive critical evaluations of the authors’ work, particularly in relation to the appropriateness of methods used, whether the results are accurate, and whether the conclusions are supported by the results. Editorial decisions should be based on peer reviewer comments that meet these criteria rather than on recommendations made by short, superficial peer reviewer reports which do not provide a rationale for the recommendations.
  • Manuscripts that do not report primary research or secondary analysis of primary research, such as Editorials, Book Reviews or Commentaries, may be accepted without peer review. Such manuscripts should be assessed by the Editor(s) if the topic is in the area of expertise of the Editor(s); if the topic is not in area of expertise of the Editor(s), such manuscripts should be assessed by at least one independent expert reviewer or Editorial Board Member.
 
Potential peer reviewers should inform the Editor of any possible conflicts of interest before accepting an invitation to review a manuscript. Reviewers should decline to review manuscripts with which they believe they have a competing interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Communications between Editors and peer reviewers contain confidential information that should not be shared with third parties.
 
1.1 Invitation to Review
 
Manuscripts submitted to Net Zero is reviewed by at least two experts, who may be volunteer reviewers, reviewer board members, or reviewers suggested by the academic editor during the preliminary check. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the quality of the manuscript and make recommendations to editors as to whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised (major or minor revisions needed), or rejected.
 
We ask invited reviewers to:
 
  • accept or decline any invitation as soon as possible (according to the manuscript title and abstract).
  • recommend alternative reviewers, if an invitation must be declined.
  • apply for an extension as soon as possible if more time is required to provide a comprehensive report.
 
1.2 Potential Conflicts of Interest
 
If a reviewer is unsure whether something constitutes a potential conflict of interest, we ask the reviewer to declare any potential conflict of interest and email it to the journal editorial office as soon as possible. Possible conflicts of interest include (but are not limited to):
 
  • Reviewer works in the same institute as one of the authors.
  • Reviewer is a co-author, collaborator, co-founder, or has any other academic ties to any of the authors within the past five years.
  • Reviewer has a close personal relationship with, rivalry with, or aversion to any of the authors.
  • Reviewer may gain or lose financially from the publication of the paper in any way.
  • Reviewer has any other non-financial conflict of interest (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial, or any other) with any of the authors.
  • Reviewers should disclose any conflicts of interest that may be seen as supporting or opposing the paper or the authors.
 
Note that if reviewers are asked to evaluate manuscripts they previously reviewed for other journals, this is not considered to be a conflict of interest. In this case, reviewers are encouraged to let the Editorial Office know whether the manuscript has been improved or not compared to previous versions.
 
1.3 Peer Review Manipulation
 
Manipulation of a peer review process is using dishonest or fraudulent practices to prevent or inappropriately influence the independent assessment of a piece of scholarly work by an independent peer, with the goal of influencing the publication record and/or achieving financial gain.
 
In cases where there is a suspicion or allegation of peer review manipulation, we will follow COPE flowcharts on peer review.
 
1.4 Benefits for reviewers
 
  • For each completed peer review, reviewers are eligible for a certain discount on the Article processing charge. The discounts add up, and depending on the number of reviews done, a reviewer may be eligible for a 100 percent discount/waiver on the Article processing charge.
  • For each manuscript they review, reviewers receive a Certificate of Reviewing.
  • Reviewers with a solid academic track record may apply for Membership in the Editorial Board upon completion of several reviews.
  • Reviewers get listed in the annual reviewer's list published on Journal's website to acknowledge the reviewers in the past year.
  • Reviewers get recognition from Publons for their peer review contributions.
 
1.5 Privacy and Confidentiality
 
In Net Zero, manuscripts must be reviewed with due respect for authors' confidentiality. In submitting their manuscripts for review, authors entrust editors with the results of their scientific work and creative effort, on which their reputation and career may depend. This means you cannot share the contents of the manuscript with anyone without prior authorization from the editor.
 
Since peer review is confidential, you also must not share information about the review with anyone without permission from the editors and authors.
 
Information concerning the manuscript (including the content of the manuscript, the status of the review process, peer review comments, and editorial decisions, etc.) must not be disclosed by the editor to anyone other than the author and reviewers. Reviewers should also be careful not to reveal their identities to authors in their comments or in the metadata of reports submitted in Microsoft Word, PDF, or Latex format.
 
Reviewers and editors must respect the rights of authors, and must not publicly discuss the authors' work or misappropriate their ideas before the manuscript is published. Without the permission of the editor, reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscripts and are prohibited from sharing the manuscript with others.
 
2. Plagiarism Policy
 
Net Zero has a Zero tolerance policy towards plagiarism. All articles are scanned through CrossCheck. CrossCheck receipt will be provided to authors with review reports if necessary. Authors are requested to check plagiarism at their end as well, in order to avoid any unpleasant situation.
 
Please respect the work of other researchers by proper quotation and citation in your article. If any article is found plagiarized, it will not be published in our journal at any cost. If you find infringement of the copyright of your work in any work of Net Zero, please inform us with proper evidence for corrective measures. Contact us immediately in case of plagiarism related queries [email protected].
 
3. Publication Ethics
 
3.1 Publication Ethics Statement
 
Global Science Publishing closely follows the guidelines and core practices of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). As a publisher of academic works Global Science Publishing, our editors and publishing partners subscribe to the principles of academic freedom, editorial independence and the highest levels of research integrity. By submitting a manuscript to our journal, each author explicitly confirms that the manuscript meets the highest ethical standards from the author and coauthors including proper statistical investigations and thorough ethical reviews by the data owning organizations. All submitted manuscripts must conform to Global Science Publishing's policies as described.
 
The following policies apply to all Global Science Publishing journals and please refer to any additional requirements outlined by the journal before your submission.
 
Where concerns about academic misconduct or potential errors in our published content are raised, our actions are guided by the COPE recommendations. Concerns raised anonymously, or by whistleblowers are treated with the same degree of rigor and thoroughness.
 
3.2 Types of research misconduct
 
Plagiarism
 
In addition to the direct copying of text, with or without paraphrasing, from a single source without proper acknowledgement, the common types of plagiarism are: Mosaic plagiarism (patchwork plagiarism) and Self-plagiarism/ text-recycling.
 
  • Mosaic plagiarism (patchwork plagiarism): This is when text is lifted from a few different sources (which may include your own previous work) and put into your manuscript to create the impression of new text.
  • Self-plagiarism/ text-recycling: This is the redundant reuse of your own work (e.g., text, data, and images), including text translated from another language, usually without proper citation. It creates repetition in the academic literature and can skew meta-analyses if you publish the same sets of data multiple times as 'new' data.
 
Of course, other types of plagiarism also exist. What they all have in common is a lack of transparency to the original source of the material used in the manuscript.
 
Duplicate publishing
 
Duplicate publication is the publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published, without clear, visible reference to the previous publication. Prior publication may include the release of information in the public domain.
 
Falsification or Fabrication of Data
 
Data fabrication is the intentional misinterpretation of research results, reporting experiments that were never conducted, or the manipulation of accurate data to suit a desired outcome. Image manipulation is a specific type of data manipulation and relates to e.g., duplication of parts within an image, or use of identical images to show different things.
 
Global Science Publishing takes issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice.
 
Once the manuscript is found to have committed publication misconduct, we will immediately impose the penalties mentioned above.
 
We reserve the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing an erratum or corrigendum (correction); rejecting the manuscript or withdrawing the published paper (Guidelines for retraction of articles-COPE Retraction guidelines); taking up the matter with the head of the department or dean of the author's institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; releasing all penalty documents in Global Science Publishing website.
 
It is important to be reminded that Research Misconduct is purposeful misconduct and as such does not include honest error or differences of opinion which may occur at time to time in research and which can generally be corrected or outlined at the time of publication.
 
3.3 Authorship
 
Everyone listed as an author should meet our criteria for authorship. Everyone who meets our criteria for authorship must be listed as an author, and the contributions of all authors must be reported. All authors are expected to have made substantial contributions to the submitted work and to be accountable for the work both before and after publication. According to the ICMJE guidelines, to qualify as an author one should have (i) made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; and (ii) been involved in drafting the manuscript or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; and (iii) given final approval of the version to be published. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content; and (iv) agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Acquisition of funding, collection of data or general supervision of the research group alone; does not usually justify authorship.
 
We expect that all authors will take public responsibility for the content of the manuscript submitted to Global Science Publishing. All manuscripts must be submitted by an author and may not be submitted by a third party.
 
The corresponding author takes primary responsibility for communication with the journal and editorial office during the submission process, throughout peer review, and during publication. The corresponding author is also responsible for ensuring that the submission adheres to all journal requirements including, but not exclusive to, details of authorship, study ethics and ethics approval, clinical trial registration documents, and conflict of interest declaration. The corresponding author should also be available post-publication to respond to any queries or critiques. Although the corresponding author has primary responsibility for correspondence with the journal, all authors will be contacted by email to ensure that they are aware of and approve the submission of the manuscript, its content, and its authorship.
 
3.4 Authorship Changes
 
Global Science Publishing journals follow the COPE guidelines for changes in authorship.
 
Changing the author list after submission requires agreement from all authors. This includes additions, deletions, and changes in ordering. Requests must come from the corresponding author along with an explanation of how any added authors contributed to the work and why author(s) are being added/removed after the initial submission. The corresponding author must also provide to Global Science Publishing documentation verifying that all authors, including any being added, deleted, or reordered, have given written consent to the change(s). Authorship change requests are subject to Global Science Publishing' approval; we may require validation of authorship contributions from an institutional official.
 
Global Science Publishing does not generally consider requests to add or remove authors between acceptance and publication of the article. If there are special circumstances that apply to your article such that a post-accept authorship change is needed, please contact the journal office. These requests require approval by the journal's editorial team.
 
In the case of an authorship dispute, the journal will not arbitrate. If the authors are unable to resolve the dispute themselves, we will defer the issue to the authors' institution(s) in accordance with COPE guidelines. The journal will abide by institutional recommendations following authorship investigations, with rare exception.
 
Authorship changes after publication are addressed via Corrections, except in rare circumstances.
 
3.5 Acknowledgment
 
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the 'Acknowledgment' section. Authors have a responsibility to get approval from persons named in the acknowledgment section.
 
3.6 Conflicts of Interest
 
Authors must declare all relevant financial or non-financial, professional, or personal competing interests that could be perceived as conflicting during manuscript submission. If no conflicts exist, the authors should state that there is no conflict of interest to declare.
 
3.7 Ethical Guidelines for Journal Editors
 
  • Journal editors should give unbiased consideration to each manuscript submitted for publication. They should judge each on its merits, without regard to race, religion, nationality, sex, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the author(s).
  • Journal editors must keep the peer-review process confidential. They must not share information about a manuscript with anyone outside of the peer-review process.
  • If a journal editor receives a credible allegation of misconduct by an author, reviewer, or journal editor, then they have a duty to investigate the matter with Global Science Publishing.
  • Journal editors may reject a submitted manuscript without formal peer review if they consider it to be inappropriate for the journal and outside its scope.
  • Journal editors should make all reasonable efforts to process submissions on time.
  • Journal editors should delegate the peer review of any original self-authored research article to a member of the editorial or advisory board as appropriate.
  • If a journal editor receives convincing evidence that the main substance or conclusions of an article published in the journal are incorrect, then, in consultation with the publisher, the journal editor should ensure the publication of an appropriate notice of correction.
  • Any data or analysis presented in a submitted manuscript should not be used in a journal editor's own research without the consent of the author.
  • Keep submission and peer review details confidential, as required. Do not upload files, images or information from unpublished manuscripts into databases or tools that do not guarantee confidentiality, are accessible by the public and/or may store or use this information for their own purposes (for example, generative AI tools like ChatGPT).
 
3.8 Post-publication
 
The correspondence provides access to the post-publication conversation. If any readers have any concerns about any of the stories published, they can write a letter to the editor. Erratum, correction, and retraction can be used to remedy any errors or faults detected in the article. For significant concerns that potentially impact the reliability of the research, the editor will initiate an investigation to determine how the concern will be addressed. Original authors and reviewers will be included in the investigation as needed. The editor will strive to complete investigations within 60 days of reporting. Outcomes of the investigation may include:
 
  • No Change
  • Correction: Article is updated, including publication metadata; Correction notice is issued in the next issue of the journal
  • Retraction: Article page is updated with retraction notice and reason for retraction; A retraction notice is issued in the next issue of the journal
 
In the case of a correction or erratum, the peer reviewed and revised document will be amended and re-published on our website, along with the posting of a Correction, after the update request has been accepted. Meanwhile, a link created between the correction/erratum article and the original article to make readers and other users/systems aware of the correction. The Retraction decisions are based on COPE Retraction Guidelines.
 
More processing key points following the guidance of COPE-Handling of post-publication critiques.
 
4. Privacy Policy
 
At Net Zero, we are committed to protecting the privacy and confidentiality of our authors, reviewers, and visitors. This Privacy Statement outlines our dedication to safeguarding personal information and explains how we collect, use, and protect data.
 
  • Collection of Personal Information: When authors submit manuscripts, or individuals interact with our website, we may collect personal information such as names, contact details, and affiliations. This information is voluntarily provided and is essential for the peer review and publication process.
  • Use of Personal Information: Personal information collected is used for the purposes of manuscript evaluation, peer review, editorial correspondence, and publication. We may also use this information to communicate important updates, announcements, and relevant content to our users.
  • Protection of Personal Information: We employ industry-standard security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. Access to personal data is restricted to authorized personnel who are bound by confidentiality obligations.
  • Data Retention: Personal information is retained for as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes outlined in this Privacy Statement or as required by law. Authors and users have the right to request the removal of their personal information from our records upon completion of the publishing process.
  • Third-Party Disclosure: We do not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer personal information to third parties. However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to trusted third parties to assist in website operation and improvement.
  • Cookies and Analytics: Our website may use cookies and analytics tools to enhance user experience and gather aggregated data about website traffic and interaction. Users may choose to disable cookies through their web browser settings.
  • Consent and Updates: By using our website or submitting manuscripts, users consent to the terms outlined in this Privacy Statement. We reserve the right to update or modify this Privacy Statement, and any changes will be communicated through our website.
 
Net Zero is committed to maintaining the highest standards of data privacy and compliance with relevant privacy laws and regulations.